Monday, November 17, 2008

Our Own Complacent Idiocy

Well I believe that I have officially been "told". That analytical Eckstein mind sifted through all the BS and picked out my hypocrisy. You are correct. I am not above the apathy that has engrossed America. There are many times when I could be more informed and/or active in political affairs. In fact perhaps I evidence this trait to a greater degree than many. Many people can claim that they were to busy with kids, work, or bills to go vote. I on the other hand have plenty of time and a lack of good excuses. While I may place a greater importance and interest in our federal government, local issues will likely effect me in more immediate and apparent ways. All this to say kudos cousin. I'm afraid I'll have to find a very convincing reason not to vote next time. After considering the comments of my dear cousin, who inspired this blog, I found myself drawn to the topic further. First let's investigate the value and validity of voting. Let's begin by assuming that your vote does have value and affects the course of political affairs. Validity in this example refers to the question of whether your vote is largely a personal choice or merely following a trend. The reason I ask this question of validity is because the idea behind our government is that the majority of voters will be capable of independent educated thought and the elected candidates will reflect this allowing for a diverse and adaptable body to rule. I acknowledge that this assumption will not be shared by some. If our votes are to be valid we must have the ability to analyze and filter the information we receive. When the majority of the public lacks this ability and will quite easily believe anything that is shown to them on a TV screen the validity of the system is broken. At this point one must make a judgment call. Can most Americans make the distinctions between truth and propaganda? At it's most basic level this question tests the very character of Americans. It is not merely a question of whether my vote is valid. It is a question of whether the majority of voters are valid. If this is not the case the entire system of voting is not valid. Invalidating your individual vote. To boil all this down to it's most simple format. Does the American government still represent Americans? I believe most Americans would respond with a patriotic "Yes!". My issue with this is that I do not believe they have stopped to consider the question. Tell me how one goes about determining the actual representative power of the government? Perhaps I haven't been getting out enough but I do not recall ever hearing about any type of research on this question. It is not discussed in the media. Perhaps in political academia things of this nature are reviewed. All this to say that there are many factors to consider before determining whether your vote on a specific issue for a specific occasion actually matters.
There was a second concept that caught my attention in the latter half of my cousins comment. "making a difference starts at a local level." I loved this statement. Making a difference does start in the lowest level of interactions. Not simply city governments and such but also the discussions and questions we delve into in our social circles. At this very moment by reading my blog (and hopefully contributing afterward) you and I can change our ideas about government, voting, and a many other issues. I hope someday reasonable people will begin talking about these thing more often. That people will begin to change and take an interest in reality outside their own contentment. This is the reality that lead to our independence from Britain and will lead us to independence from our own complacent idiocy. Perhaps the concerned voter of today would better serve by discussing these things with their coworkers and friends.
The reason why I emphasize the importance of social interactions in my previous paragraph is this. Local and state governments are losing power. I state this as a matter of opinion based on a small amount of research and observation. What happens when the federal government begins instituting a health care program, retirement program, gasoline credit program, house credit program, etc...? These policies and procedures are influenced to some degree by our local governments. However with time these programs become almost entirely controlled by federal regulation which our voting power has less effect on. Let's take for example federal income tax. Who get's the largest portion of the taxes on your paycheck? If your answer was the federal government you share the plight of most Americans. Social Security is another example. I pay into a well known mismanaged and unsustainable system that was implemented at the federal level. If this continues how long will city and state governments be necessary beyond acting as enforcers for federal legislation. If this trend continues the concerned population must begin interacting and organizing into a voice that can be heard by federal government in order to effect change. The point I am attempting to make is this. Local politics has it's place and importance based on our support or the lack thereof. If indeed change is a process brought about at a "local level" we must be aware of the changes in the power and scope of our local and federal governments. Thoughts anyone?

Labels: , , , , , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger Chrissy Cross said...

I think that since all politicians have to start somewhere, like a school board, city council, etc... It is very important to be educated about who and what people stand for, who knows, one of these people may be president someday. In the statewide, and national elections I believe you have to vote the best you can based on information that you aquire about the candidates. Unfortunately, unless I am mistaken, that is how Hitler came to power. So it is definitely a double edged sword. Voting is a great rights, but with that privaledge comes a responsibility to use the right with care. And based on many of the idiots that do vote, sometimes democracy is unfortunate because it empowers the idiots.

10:31 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Ahh, now I feel bad, but I was really just trying to make a point that I think you can still make a difference somehow, someway. Good post. In something I was reading for my western civ class I came across an article or book that was talking about what you've just talked about and this debate was going on when our country was founded. People like Jefferson envisioned something more like what we have today, a democracy where everyone gets to put in their opinion. Others, like Madison (I think it was him, don't quote me) didn't trust the people and designed the constitution so that the U.S. would operate more as a republic with educated people representing the entire population and making educated decisions about what was best for the country and individuals. So the U.S. was actually set up as a republic, not a democracy which says something about the constitutional father's views of the intelligence of the "public". Don't think that really answers questions but I thought it was very interesting and something that I didn't know before.

2:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, Nat, I will post a comment.

(By the way, I hate the fac that I cannot see the blog post while I am trying to comment. Blogger is stupid, but sadly more functional than 360).

I agree that the "public" is unable to make wise decisions in general. Hence, as Holly pointed out, the wisdom of Madison and the other framers of the consitution who succesfully bypassed human ignorance with a republic system of government ruled not by people, but by the Consitution. That is the true brillance of the ORIGINAL USA government system: the Consitution was the ruler of the land, not a person. That is why all federal oaths of office require a person to swear to uphold the Constituion, NOT be a good ruler or serve the people. The Constitution was designed to be the supreme ruler of the USA, not the president, Congress, the Supreme Court, or any other person. Again, I say this is absolutely brilliant because a document cannot be bribed, decieved, or suddenly become foolish. That is pure genious and completely unheard of prior to the Constitutional Convention. Sadly, it took less than one lifetime for the elected leaders to start trying to usurp authority from the Constitution and take it for themselves. The most egregious departures from the Constitution came from FDR, but he was not the first. Sadly though, he set the precedent and since his time, people have looked to the president and Congress to rule rather than the Constitution. Our founders knew that government inevitably becomes corrupt, so the best solution is too limit its power and growth, not try to invent the "perfect system". It won't happen. So, if you want the best possible government, prevent it (and the people in it) from obtaining power. That is the only solution that will ever work, because human nature is corrupt, and so will all governments run by humans.

Hopefully someday we can implement a situtation as Isaac Asimov described in iRobot where giant computers run the world. I believe that is our only hope for non-corrupt government.

Alright, now I've posted Nat. You're welcome.

MATT

1:38 PM  
Blogger thegnat777 said...

Thanks to everyone for your comments. First I'd like to address the Republic vs Democracy concept. Originally the legislative branch of government consisted of elected representation (House of Representatives) and appointed representation (Senate). From my understanding this was to allow the voters to have influence on any changes or additions to the constitution. The senate ideally would be composed of the elite who could focus on the greatest good with less concern over keeping their position. However with the ratification of the 17th amendment the Senate became yet another body of elected representation. At this point the legislative branch became largely democratic. Based on these interpretations we are now responsible for empowering the men that are primarily responsible for changes in national policy. These are the concepts and issues that we can propagate among our family and friends. Regardless of our current government if our economy get's really bad people will be grateful that someone helped them to gain a more analytical and informed thought process. I loved your comments and it inspired me to pursue some in depth research of our republican roots and the drift towards democracy. A brilliant example of exactly what we need to see more often.

9:35 AM  
Blogger Jessica said...

Nat!!! I didn't know you were on here! Love what you've posted so far. Unfortunately my brain is too shot right now to formulate a comment other than WELCOME!!!!!

6:50 PM  
Blogger Brittany said...

um, new blog please...

11:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home